“Beyond the Border: What Ukraine’s Deep-Strike Drone Attack Means for the Future of Proxy and Drone Warfare”
- CYIS Organisation
- 2 days ago
- 12 min read
Written by Viktoriia Rafalovych, Maximilian Wolf, Sophie Rieckmann, Andrei I. Cursaru
Edited by Andrei I. Cursaru
Introduction
In June 2025, Ukraine launched a bold and unprecedented drone strike deep inside Russian territory. In a carefully orchestrated operation, 117 explosive-laden drones were smuggled into Russia hidden in wooden crates and triggered remotely at the edges of five major air bases. The result: a highly effective surprise attack that targeted some of Russia’s most strategic military assets. While Ukraine claims the destruction of over 40 aircraft, independent analysts place the number closer to 10-12. Even at the lower end, this attack signals a dramatic turning point in the evolution of drone and proxy warfare, redefining traditional assumptions about distance, deterrence, and defence.
1. The Operation: A Breakdown of the Attack
Ukraine’s audacious drone strike, dubbed Operation Spiderweb, targeted four strategic Russian air bases: Belaya (Irkutsk, Siberia), Olenya (Murmansk, Arctic region), Diaghilev (Ryazan, near Moscow), and Ivanovo (also near Moscow). The objective was clear: degrade Russia’s capacity to launch long-range aerial assaults by hitting its most valuable aerial assets.
What makes this operation remarkable is its deceptive simplicity. According to Ukrainian military expert Serhiy "Flash" Beskrestnov, “the simpler the technically implemented operation, the higher the probability of its success.” Over the course of several months, an estimated 117 FPV drones were clandestinely smuggled into Russia inside the roofs of wooden mobile homes. These containers were loaded onto commercial trucks and transported across Russian territory- an operation that allegedly involved unwitting local drivers.
Once parked near the bases, the drones were launched from inside Russian territory by remotely retracting the containers’ wooden lids. Each drone was individually controlled via Russian mobile telecom networks, enabling precise targeting while minimising human risk. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that all Ukrainian agents had exited the country before the operation began, though Russian authorities later claimed to have detained several individuals linked to the attack.
The result: significant damage to high-value assets, including Tu-95 strategic bombers, Tu-22M3 supersonic bombers, and A-50 airborne early warning aircraft. While Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) estimates over 40 aircraft were hit, independent analysts place the number between 10 and 12. Nevertheless, material losses are believed to exceed $7 billion, and the strike represents a severe blow to Russia’s aerial deterrence capabilities.
This operation marks a paradigm shift in modern warfare, demonstrating how asymmetric tactics, low-cost drones, and local networks can effectively bypass traditional defences and deliver high-impact strategic results deep within enemy territory.
2. Strategic Significance: What This Means for Russia
The impact of Operation Spiderweb on Russia’s military capabilities is far-reaching. By targeting strategic bombers like the Tu-95, Tu-22M3, and A-50 early warning aircraft- key platforms for cruise missile launches and nuclear signalling- Ukraine struck at the core of Russia’s strategic air deterrence. Damage or destruction of approximately 40 aircraft, according to the SBU, may have eliminated up to one-third of Russia’s long-range missile carriers in a single operation.
The New York Times called it one of the most embarrassing security failures for Moscow since the start of the war. Operational details were released as the attack was still unfolding, a bold public relations strategy by Ukraine designed to highlight both the simplicity and effectiveness of the raid. Drones – built for just $300–600 apiece – were smuggled inside wooden mobile homes and launched via mobile telecom networks from deep inside Russian territory. The crude, low-cost tactics only deepened the humiliation of a military that had long touted itself as a global power.
The psychological and symbolic blow was compounded by Ukraine’s transparency. SBU head General Vasyl Maliuk shared post-operation details, revealing that 117 drones and 117 pilots were involved, each assigned specific aircraft types and coordinates. Video evidence confirmed hits on multiple high-value, Soviet-era aircraft- models no longer in production- suggesting damage worth an estimated $7 billion. Some reports suggest that the Tu-95s and Tu-22 planes cannot be replaced, due to the current state of Russia’s domestic aerospace engineering capabilities, perhaps rendering them out of action for the long term. This would be a huge strategic win for Ukraine.
At home, the response was euphoric. The Kyiv Post reported Ukrainians celebrating the scale and audacity of the mission. Beyond boosting national morale, the release of detailed operational data demonstrated the power of asymmetric warfare against a larger, nuclear-armed adversary.
Strategically, the raid exposed the fragility of Russia’s layered defences. Even after launching its largest air assault to date on Ukraine in late May- using over 260 drones and 60 cruise missiles- Russia proved unable to defend key bases thousands of kilometres from the front lines. This vulnerability is stark: after three years of war, Russia has lost over 21,000 pieces of military equipment, including 4,000 tanks- many of which have been replaced by antiquated T-55s and T-62s first fielded during the Cold War.
While Russia has maintained control over areas held prior to the 2022 invasion, it has gained little since. Even in its most successful recent campaigns, Moscow managed to seize only around 4,000 square kilometres in 2024- less than 1% of Ukraine’s total landmass.
Meanwhile, Ukraine has outmanoeuvred its adversary with leaner resources and a bolder strategy. It has sunk the Moskva, captured parts of Kursk Oblast, and executed drone raids on oil refineries, fuel depots, and now deep-strike attacks on strategic airfields across Russia. In this context, Operation Spiderweb may mark a turning point – a moment of crescendo in Ukraine’s demonstration of strategic innovation, resilience, and asymmetric dominance.
3. Drone Warfare Reimagined
By far the most significant innovation of the past three years has been Ukraine’s revolutionary use of first person view (FPV) drones, both as tactical elements aiding in, and vastly improving, reconnaissance and artillery targeting, and as weapons in themselves: Armed with grenades or other light munitions, the AFU uses these relatively cheap and easily replaceable FPV units to target enemy positions and vehicles from the air or as “kamikaze drones” flying into vehicles and detonating their payload. Beyond anything seen in the Ukrainian theater so far, “Operation Spiderweb” illustrated the tactical upside of these FPV systems: able to launch quickly and inconspicuously from the ground, move fast and below radar detection in coordinated swarms, with minimal personnel in harm’s way, 117 Ukrainian drone pilots destroyed up to a third of Russia’s long-range strike capabilities.
Perhaps more impressive than the tactical innovation, however, are the logistics behind it. Having discovered the unique capabilities and excellent cost-benefit ratio of FPV systems during Russia’s invasion of Crimea and Donbas in 2014, the AFU took a bold step towards making them a central part of their defence strategy, despite allied Western doubts. Their strategic wager was a massive one, producing over 1 million drones a year, and teaching tens of thousands of Ukrainians, many of them, especially since Russia’s full-scale invasion, civilians and non-combatants, how to operate them. Ukraine’s “Drone Mother”, Maria Berlinska, and her team have alone trained more than 50.000 drone pilots, using commercially available drone kits on out-of-use airfields near Kyiv. As the full-scale invasion began, this enmeshing of military and civilian capacities only grew in scale: today, Kyiv is full of makeshift drone factories in basements, abandoned warehouses and public buildings. As Ukraine’s capacities to build drones grew, so did its sophistication. As one drone operator put it: comparing drone capabilities in 2022 to those today is “like comparing rocket science with the horse and cart”.
“Operation Spiderweb” raises a further, critical question about the future of hybrid warfare and global security. With the drones involved in the attack in place within Russian territory weeks in advance, Ukraine has announced a strategic and tactical shift from border-based to in-theatre operations. Covert, mobile, cost-efficient and able to strike quickly and where it hurts, the upside of modern drone warfare for armed forces is massive, but it does raise significant security questions. The “democratisation” of Ukraine’s drone warfare strategy, with tight civil-military cooperation using easy-to-come-by, dual-use technology, also signals a key security concern for states far from the Ukrainian theatre. With Ukraine’s drone build plans and reportedly even targeting algorithms being open-source, and cheap but effective drone systems available for a few hundred euros on Amazon, the threat of malign actors, from lone wolves to terrorist groups, exploiting the current lack of counter-drone defensive systems is high. What’s more, as AI capabilities grow rapidly, so do the capabilities of drone systems to operate remotely, avoid jamming, and make attacks harder to attribute. Ukraine, already at the cutting edge of the drone revolution, is currently testing an AI-driven model enabling swarms of drones to autonomously detect, prioritise and destroy targets without human intervention, using LiDAR and camera data instead of GPS to navigate. As Ukrainian drones reshape the modern battlefield, they may also be reshaping the civil security landscape.
4. Proxy Warfare 2.0: Intelligence, Disguise, and Local Actors
Ukraine’s success in Operation Spiderweb stems not only from tactical innovation but from its seamless fusion of military precision, intelligence networks, and civilian logistics. Smuggling over 100 drones into Russian territory—across thousands of kilometres—required far more than stealth technology. It demanded deep local intelligence, long-standing covert supply chains, and a sophisticated blend of cyber, kinetic, and psychological operations.
This operation exemplifies a new mode of warfare—one where frontlines matter less than networks: networks of operatives, logistics hubs, communication systems, and digital deception. According to President Volodymyr Zelensky, the strike was designed not only to blunt Russia’s capacity to bombard Ukrainian cities, but to increase international and internal pressure on the Kremlin:
“Pressure is truly needed — pressure on Russia that should bring it back to reality.”
Ukraine’s strategy is not just militarily effective—it’s politically calculated. By executing a complex, multinational covert operation and broadcasting the details in real time, Kyiv sought to magnify psychological impact, not just military damage. The operation publicly revealed how low-cost drones, coordinated human intelligence, and mobile telecom networks can penetrate deep into supposedly secure territory, humiliating Russian defences and showcasing Ukraine’s continued adaptability.
Despite this, there is no clear sign that the Kremlin’s posture has shifted. As the New York Times reports, Moscow continues to believe it holds a strategic edge, counting on the attritional pressure of time, weakening international resolve, and Ukraine’s resource constraints.
Yet Ukraine’s approach—small teams, agile tools, global messaging—may prove more sustainable. Unlike Russia’s reliance on massed formations and outdated Soviet-era systems, Ukraine is pioneering a new hybrid warfare doctrine. Every drone strike, cyber attack, and viral video becomes part of a broader effort to reshape the narrative, stretch enemy defences, and build a coalition of resilience.
In this sense, Operation Spiderweb isn’t just a strike—it’s a signal. Proxy wars in the 21st century are no longer won by holding land, but by managing perception, disrupting networks, and leveraging asymmetry at scale.
5. Lessons for NATO and Global Powers
For NATO and allied militaries, Operation Spiderweb delivers a stark warning: no military installation is out of reach. Ukraine’s ability to strike the Belaya Air Base- deep in Siberia, nearly 4,000 kilometres from the Ukrainian border, a distance comparable to Crimea to Muscat, Oman- using low-cost, low-tech drones redefines the boundaries of modern warfare.
This shift is both psychological and strategic. Psychologically, it shatters the illusion of geographic invulnerability. Strategically, it demonstrates that intermediate-range strike capability- once the exclusive domain of costly ballistic missile systems- can now be achieved with drones priced at $300 to $600 each, deployed via civilian infrastructure and without violating foreign airspace.
Traditional air defence systems- designed to intercept high-altitude aircraft, ballistic missiles, or long-range cruise missiles- were simply not built to detect or destroy dozens of FPV drones flying low and slow, launched from inside domestic territory using local mobile networks. According to the Kyiv Independent, the operation used rudimentary launch platforms- wooden mobile homes- to bypass fixed defence structures. These drones operated below radar coverage, surfacing only at the moment of attack.
For NATO, this demands an urgent rethinking of defence postures and base security. Perimeter security alone is no longer sufficient. Bases across Europe, especially those hosting strategic assets or logistics hubs, are now potentially within striking range- not from across borders, but from within their own host countries.
To respond effectively, NATO and partner nations must:
Rapidly invest in counter-UAS systems, including portable jamming units, radar overlays for low-altitude threats, and automated kinetic interceptors like C-UAS drones or lasers.
Deploy low-tech countermeasures such as machine gun nests, mesh canopies, and visual decoys to absorb or deflect drone swarms.
Create deception architecture to mislead enemy ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), including dummy aircraft, false radar signatures, and decoy heat sources.
Rethink the concept of strategic depth: the idea that distance alone provides safety is now obsolete.
Operation Spiderweb forces the West to grapple with a new military reality- asymmetry isn’t just cheaper; it’s also faster, smarter, and global. The age of deterrence through distance is over. NATO must pivot from a doctrine of perimeter defence to one of proactive, layered resilience, or risk being caught off guard in the same way Russia just was.
6. What’s Next: Escalation, Innovation, or Imitation?
While Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb has redefined the boundaries of asymmetric warfare, it also opens the door to dangerous precedents. Russia may respond in kind, leveraging covert agents, sleeper cells, or proxy forces not just within Ukraine but across Europe or abroad. As the war evolves, the use of civilian vehicles, infrastructure, and local operatives as covert staging platforms could quickly become a two-way street.
Beyond Moscow, other actors are taking note. From Iran-backed militias to North Korean operatives and non-state terror networks, the blueprint for a low-cost, high-impact strike deep inside enemy territory is now public. The cost-effectiveness of drone saturation campaigns could lead to widespread adoption by state and non-state actors alike, dramatically lowering the threshold for long-range attacks.
At the same time, Russia is adapting quickly. Despite early setbacks, it is now racing to develop its own advanced drone systems, integrating AI-powered targeting, autonomous flight capabilities, and directed-energy weapons into its evolving arsenal. As highlighted in The National Interest, the Kremlin sees drone warfare not only as a tactical necessity but as a path to regain technological parity with NATO.
This growing arms race raises pressing legal and ethical concerns. Ukraine’s use of civilian infrastructure to stage military operations- such as embedding drones in wooden mobile homes and launching them via commercial telecom networks- blurs the line between civilian and combatant roles. As international law relies on clear distinctions between civilian and military targets, this new form of warfare risks undermining core tenets of the Geneva Conventions.
Further complicating the battlefield is the shift toward autonomous combat systems. Ukraine, according to military analysts, is already field-testing drones that operate without GPS, instead relying on LiDAR, camera-based vision, and machine learning algorithms to swarm, identify, prioritise, and strike targets with no human in the loop. These capabilities introduce unprecedented speed and scalability, but also challenge existing doctrines of accountability, targeting ethics, and human oversight.
In short, we are witnessing the dawn of open-source warfare, where inexpensive commercial components, decentralised intelligence networks, and AI convergence are transforming military power. The next phase of conflict may not be determined by who has the most tanks or aircraft, but by who can deploy, adapt, and control autonomous, distributed, and deniable forces at speed and at scale.
Conclusion: The End of Strategic Distance
1. Regulate Autonomous Weapons Systems
The rapid proliferation of AI-enabled and dual-use drone technologies demands robust international legal frameworks. Autonomous weapons operating without human oversight present ethical and accountability gaps, especially as their components- motors, sensors, and targeting algorithms- are increasingly accessible through open-source platforms. Governments and multilateral bodies must:
Establish clear definitions and restrictions on lethal autonomous systems.
Monitor the distribution of drone blueprints and components on public repositories.
Develop oversight mechanisms for dual-use technologies shared in civilian markets.
2. Invest in Scalable Counter-Drone Defence
The Ukraine war has shown that urban centres and military sites alike are vulnerable to low-cost UAVs. Defending against such threats requires layered, adaptive systems- from RF jamming and laser interception to acoustic detection and kinetic denial. Cities, public venues, and critical infrastructure must be treated as potential targets. The cost-imposition advantage of drone warfare can only be offset by distributed and cost-effective defences.
3. Secure the Global Drone Supply Chain
With blueprints, components, and build instructions available on platforms like GitHub, the drone supply chain is increasingly open, decentralised, and global. Export controls, end-user verification, and surveillance of high-risk distributors are critical to preventing the misuse of commercially available drone systems by non-state actors, terrorists, and rogue states.
4. Strengthen Cross-Border Intelligence Cooperation
No country can confront these challenges alone. To counter the growing use of drones by non-state actors and foreign proxies, states must build shared threat databases, harmonise counter-drone protocols, and establish joint early-warning systems. NATO and allied partners should integrate drone threat modelling into both military planning and civil emergency management systems.
5. Work with Hobbyists
Hobbyist technology enthusiasts are often overlooked as a valuable resource. They often push the boundaries of technology long before industry or the military and creatively explore dual-use and convergent capabilities. Their knowledge of particular devices and technologies may also exceed that of the experts. Thus, engaging with creative thinkers in the technology space could significantly aid in refining predictions of possible future threats and mapping all possible uses of particular technologies, including drones.
As the war in Ukraine becomes a laboratory for 21st-century warfare, the lessons it offers will shape not only how we fight but also how we legislate, defend, and protect societies in an era where anyone, anywhere, can project force. Operation Spiderweb is not just a warning- it’s a blueprint for both innovation and regulation in the wars to come.
Comments